Immigration & Labor

Lawsuit Filed Against Super Bowl 50’s Food Service Company

Yesterday, in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, attorney Caren P. Sencer of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld filed a lawsuit against Centerplate, the company that provides food and beverage service at Levi’s Stadium, recent host of Super Bowl 50. Among the allegations in the complaint is that Centerplate did not pay employees for all hours worked, failed to grant rest breaks as required by California law, and engaged in unfair business practices. The lawsuit, if granted class status, would cover all Centerplate employees at Levi’s Stadium who worked during the 2015-2016 NFL season.

I worked for Centerplate at Levi’s Stadium during four games, including the Super Bowl. My post was inside the Yahoo Fantasy Football Lounge, one of the stadium’s ten “premium club areas.” As I wrote in Slate — in a story reported in partnership with The Investigative Fund — I was often not given rest breaks, even during shifts that exceeded twelve hours. And on the day of the Super Bowl, Centerplate failed to pay employees for the time they spent waiting in line for — and traveling on — employee shuttles to and from the stadium. Those hours added up: of my seventeen-hour shift, five of them were spent waiting or in transit. According to California law, these hours should have been on the clock.

For many workers, wage theft is routine. In 2009, a study by three organizations — the UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, the National Employment Law Project, and the UIC Center for Urban Economic Development — found that low-wage workers in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City lost more than $56 million per week due to various forms of wage theft and other forms of labor violations. Last October, California Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation that makes it easier for workers to recover back wages, including a provision that holds individual executives, and not just the corporate body, accountable for unpaid wages. Along with Centerplate, the lawsuit names Chris Verros, the company's President and CEO, along with several other executives.

For now, I am the named plaintiff in the lawsuit. (I kept good records.) When I received my paycheck for the Super Bowl, I found that the company paid me at the overtime rate — time and a half — for all hours that I was on the clock. That was a pleasant surprise. But I, and likely many other workers, was still significantly shortchanged. Had I been paid at my regular rate of $12.25 an hour for all the hours that I worked, including overtime and double-overtime for work after twelve hours, my paycheck would have been 70 dollars greater. (In my original investigation for Slate, when calculating wages owed, I had forgotten to factor in these higher rates.)

Looking back at the Super Bowl, what strikes me is the extraordinary amount of attention that was given to topics like the quality of the turf at Levi’s Stadium, and how little consideration was given to the thousands of workers who made the event possible and who, at the very least, should get what they’re owed.

About the reporter

Gabriel Thompson

Gabriel Thompson

Gabriel Thompson is an author and independent journalist.

×

We bring hidden stories to light. Don’t miss the next one! Get our free newsletter now.

Subscribe